RegistryCompare › Bright Data MCP vs Codebase Memory MCP

Bright Data MCP vs Codebase Memory MCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Bright Data MCP and Codebase Memory MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Codebase Memory MCP leads on trust — 93.6/100 (Grade A) vs 75.0/100 (Grade B), a 18.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Bright Data MCPbrightdata/brightdata-mcp Codebase Memory MCPDeusData/codebase-memory-mcp
HVTrust score 75.0 93.6
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #88 #3
Rank in MCP Servers #9 #1
GitHub stars 2.7k 43.9k
Last updated 4d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 3.8 / 10 8.6 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 8k/wk 16k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 13.7 20.4
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 11.7 15.8
Maintenance / 20 13.4 20.0
Adoption / 20 13.5 16.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Bright Data MCP profile Codebase Memory MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →