RegistryCompare › BoxLite vs OpenShell

BoxLite vs OpenShell

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of BoxLite and OpenShell, two Sandboxes & Runtimes projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

BoxLite leads on trust — 85.6/100 (Grade A) vs 70.6/100 (Grade B), a 15.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal BoxLiteboxlite-ai/boxlite OpenShellNVIDIA/OpenShell
HVTrust score 85.6 70.6
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #68 #320
Rank in Sandboxes & Runtimes #1 #5
GitHub stars 2.3k 8.7k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 5.2 / 10 6.5 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 20k/wk 25k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.0 13.1
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.9 14.0
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 13.8 15.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 2 — Postgres, Redis 3 — Anthropic, OpenAI, OpenRouter
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match Unknown
Open in the live compare tool → BoxLite profile OpenShell profile More Sandboxes & Runtimes →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →