Registry › Compare › Botpress vs Hatchet

Botpress vs Hatchet

Botpress leads on trust: 86.9/100 (Grade A) against 67.3/100 (Grade B), a 19.6-point gap. Botpress leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence; Hatchet leads on maintenance.

A Botpress 86.9

The open-source hub to build & deploy GPT/LLM Agents ⚡️

botpress/botpress · #69 overall · #3 Workflow Platforms · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Botpress if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.5Safety / Integrity: 99% of recent commits signed, against 96%
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+6.2Adoption: 15k GitHub stars against 8.1k
A vs CEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

B Hatchet 67.3

🪓 An orchestration engine for background tasks, AI agents, and durable workflows

hatchet-dev/hatchet · #437 overall · #8 Workflow Platforms · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Hatchet if maintenance matters most.

+2.4Maintenance: last push today, against 3d ago

Where they differ

20.2

Safety / IntegrityBotpress +7.5

12.7

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceBotpress +7.2

10.8

13.8

TransparencyHatchet +0.1

13.9

17.6

MaintenanceHatchet +2.4

20.0

15.6

AdoptionBotpress +6.2

9.4

+1.7

Runtime calibrationBotpress +1.2

+0.5

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Botpress and Hatchet, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Botpressbotpress/botpress	Hatchethatchet-dev/hatchet
HVTrust score	86.9	67.3
Evidence grade	A	B
Coverage grade	A	C
Overall rank	#69	#437
Rank in Workflow Platforms	#3	#8
GitHub stars	15.0k	8.1k
Last updated	3d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	6.2 / 10	6.3 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	15k/wk	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	20.2	12.7
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	13.8	13.9
Maintenance / 20	17.6	20.0
Adoption / 20	15.6	9.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Implemented
External providers	—	4 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	—

Open in the live compare tool → Botpress profile Hatchet profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →