RegistryCompare › Better Harness vs Pg Aiguide

Better Harness vs Pg Aiguide

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Better Harness and Pg Aiguide, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Better Harness leads on trust — 70.6/100 (Grade B) vs 62.4/100 (Grade C), a 8.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Better HarnessQoderAI/better-harness Pg Aiguidetimescale/pg-aiguide
HVTrust score 70.6 62.4
Evidence grade B C
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #3 #6
Rank in Agent Skills #3 #6
GitHub stars 1.8k 1.8k
Last updated today 47d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 482/wk 51/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 9.0 12.0
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 8.5 8.5
Maintenance / 20 20.0 8.9
Adoption / 20 11.4 10.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic 2 — OpenAI, Postgres
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Better Harness profile Pg Aiguide profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →