RegistryCompare › Better Harness vs Oh My Claudecode

Better Harness vs Oh My Claudecode

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Better Harness and Oh My Claudecode, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Oh My Claudecode leads on trust — 84.8/100 (Grade A) vs 83.1/100 (Grade A), a 1.7-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Better HarnessQoderAI/better-harness Oh My ClaudecodeYeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode
HVTrust score 83.1 84.8
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #7 #6
Rank in Agent Skills #7 #6
GitHub stars 2.2k 39.0k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10 3.9 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 442/wk 6k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.8 14.3
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.1 11.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 11.5 16.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Better Harness profile Oh My Claudecode profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →