RegistryCompare › Better Harness vs DSH Better Sidebar

Better Harness vs DSH Better Sidebar

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Better Harness and DSH Better Sidebar, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

DSH Better Sidebar leads on trust — 72.6/100 (Grade B) vs 70.5/100 (Grade B), a 2.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Better HarnessQoderAI/better-harness DSH Better Sidebaromdsh-dev/DSH-better-sidebar
HVTrust score 70.5 72.6
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #6 #3
Rank in Agent Skills #6 #3
GitHub stars 1.9k 1.6k
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard
License MIT MIT
Downloads 482/wk 7k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 9.0 9.3
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 8.5 8.5
Maintenance / 20 19.9 19.9
Adoption / 20 11.4 12.9
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 1 — Anthropic 1 — DeepSeek
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Better Harness profile DSH Better Sidebar profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →