RegistryCompare › Better Harness vs DSH Better Sidebar

Better Harness vs DSH Better Sidebar

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Better Harness and DSH Better Sidebar, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

DSH Better Sidebar leads on trust — 83.9/100 (Grade A) vs 82.3/100 (Grade A), a 1.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Better HarnessQoderAI/better-harness DSH Better Sidebaromdsh-dev/DSH-better-sidebar
HVTrust score 82.3 83.9
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #13 #7
Rank in Agent Skills #13 #7
GitHub stars 2.2k 3.4k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10 4.3 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 489/wk 59k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.0 14.9
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.0 12.2
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 11.6 14.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 1 — Anthropic 1 — DeepSeek
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Better Harness profile DSH Better Sidebar profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →