RegistryCompare › Bernstein vs ECC

Bernstein vs ECC

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Bernstein and ECC, two Coding Agents projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

ECC leads on trust — 87.1/100 (Grade A) vs 81.9/100 (Grade A), a 5.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Bernsteinsipyourdrink-ltd/bernstein ECCaffaan-m/ECC
HVTrust score 81.9 87.1
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #54 #23
Rank in Coding Agents #7 #4
GitHub stars 788 237.7k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.3 / 10 5.4 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 36k/wk 4k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 16.6 18.4
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.7 13.1
Maintenance / 20 20.0 19.8
Adoption / 20 13.0 17.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, E2B, … 4 — Anthropic, OpenAI, Postgres, …
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface marketplace marketplace
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Bernstein profile ECC profile More Coding Agents →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →