Registry › Compare › AWS MCP Servers vs Terraform MCP Server

AWS MCP Servers vs Terraform MCP Server

AWS MCP Servers leads on trust: 73.0/100 (Grade B) against 66.7/100 (Grade B), a 6.3-point gap. AWS MCP Servers leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

B AWS MCP Servers 73.0

Open source MCP Servers for AWS

awslabs/mcp · #284 overall · #169 MCP Servers · coverage C (2/5)

Choose AWS MCP Servers if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+1.9Adoption: 9.8k GitHub stars against 1.5k
+1.8Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 9.1 against 7.7
+1.4Maintenance
+1.2Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 9.1 against 7.7

B Terraform MCP Server 66.7

The Terraform MCP Server provides seamless integration with Terraform ecosystem, enabling advanced automation and interaction capabilities for Infrastructure as Code (IaC) development.

hashicorp/terraform-mcp-server · #440 overall · #257 MCP Servers · coverage C (2/5)

Terraform MCP Server doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

16.4

Safety / IntegrityAWS MCP Servers +1.8

14.6

16.2

TransparencyAWS MCP Servers +1.2

15.0

19.0

MaintenanceAWS MCP Servers +1.4

17.6

9.6

AdoptionAWS MCP Servers +1.9

7.7

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AWS MCP Servers and Terraform MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	AWS MCP Serversawslabs/mcp	Terraform MCP Serverhashicorp/terraform-mcp-server
HVTrust score	73.0	66.7
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	C	C
Overall rank	#284	#440
Rank in MCP Servers	#169	#257
GitHub stars	9.8k	1.5k
Last updated	2d ago	2d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	9.1 / 10	7.7 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MPL-2.0
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	16.4	14.6
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	16.2	15.0
Maintenance / 20	19.0	17.6
Adoption / 20	9.6	7.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Amazon Bedrock	1 — Google Gemini
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → AWS MCP Servers profile Terraform MCP Server profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →