An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AWS MCP Servers and Grafana MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
| Signal | AWS MCP Serversawslabs/mcp | Grafana MCP Servergrafana/mcp-grafana |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 57.2 | 50.0 |
| Evidence grade | C | C |
| Coverage grade | C | C |
| Overall rank | #188 | #237 |
| Rank in MCP Servers | #1 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 9.4k | 3.2k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 8.5 / 10 | 6.7 / 10 |
| License | — | — |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 10.6 | 8.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 20 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 7.2 | 5.7 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.1 | 16.7 |
| Adoption / 20 | 9.5 | 8.4 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | — |
| External providers | — | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | — | — |
| Provenance drift | — | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →