Registry › Compare › AWS MCP Servers vs Grafana MCP Server

AWS MCP Servers vs Grafana MCP Server

AWS MCP Servers leads on trust: 73.0/100 (Grade B) against 67.9/100 (Grade B), a 5.1-point gap. AWS MCP Servers leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; Grafana MCP Server leads on maintenance.

B AWS MCP Servers 73.0

Open source MCP Servers for AWS

awslabs/mcp · #284 overall · #169 MCP Servers · coverage C (2/5)

Choose AWS MCP Servers if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+2.3Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 9.1 against 7.3
+1.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 9.1 against 7.3
+1.1Adoption: 9.8k GitHub stars against 3.5k

B Grafana MCP Server 67.9

MCP server for Grafana

grafana/mcp-grafana · #401 overall · #237 MCP Servers · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Grafana MCP Server if maintenance matters most.

+0.6Maintenance

Where they differ

16.4

Safety / IntegrityAWS MCP Servers +2.3

14.1

16.2

TransparencyAWS MCP Servers +1.5

14.7

19.0

MaintenanceGrafana MCP Server +0.6

19.6

9.6

AdoptionAWS MCP Servers +1.1

8.5

+1.0

Runtime calibrationAWS MCP Servers +0.8

+0.2

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AWS MCP Servers and Grafana MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	AWS MCP Serversawslabs/mcp	Grafana MCP Servergrafana/mcp-grafana
HVTrust score	73.0	67.9
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	C	C
Overall rank	#284	#401
Rank in MCP Servers	#169	#237
GitHub stars	9.8k	3.5k
Last updated	2d ago	2d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	9.1 / 10	7.3 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	16.4	14.1
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	16.2	14.7
Maintenance / 20	19.0	19.6
Adoption / 20	9.6	8.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Amazon Bedrock	2 — Anthropic, Google Gemini
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	—	plugins
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → AWS MCP Servers profile Grafana MCP Server profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →