Avoid Ai Writing vs Larksuite Cli
Both are Grade A and 0.2 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Avoid Ai Writing leads on transparency and maintenance; Larksuite Cli leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.
Skill that audits and rewrites content to remove AI writing patterns. Use it with your favorite agents including Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, and Hermes.
Choose Avoid Ai Writing if transparency and maintenance matter most.
- +3.1Maintenance
- +0.9Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.1 against 6.0
The official Lark/飞书 CLI tool, maintained by the larksuite team — built for humans and AI Agents. Covers core business domains including Messenger, Docs, Base, Sheets, Calendar, Mail, Tasks, Meetings, and more, with 200+ commands and 20+ AI Agent Skills.
Choose Larksuite Cli if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.
- +3.9Adoption: 120.1k weekly downloads against 1.4k
- +2.0Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 33%
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Avoid Ai Writing and Larksuite Cli, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Avoid Ai Writingconorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing | Larksuite Clilarksuite/cli |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 88.1 | 88.3 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #6 | #5 |
| Rank in Agent Skills | #6 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 5.2k | 17.8k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.1 / 10 | 6.0 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 1k/wk | 120k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 18.0 | 20.0 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.5 | 13.6 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 16.8 |
| Adoption / 20 | 13.1 | 17.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | — |
| External providers | 1 — Anthropic | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →