Avoid Ai Writing vs Claude Mem
Both are Grade A and 2.1 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Avoid Ai Writing leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; Claude Mem leads on maintenance and adoption.
Skill that audits and rewrites content to remove AI writing patterns. Use it with your favorite agents including Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, and Hermes.
Choose Avoid Ai Writing if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +2.1Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.1 against 4.6
- +0.5Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.1 against 4.6
Persistent Context Across Sessions for Every Agent – Captures everything your agent does during sessions, compresses it with AI, and injects relevant context back into future sessions. Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, Gemini, Hermes, Copilot, OpenCode + More
Choose Claude Mem if maintenance and adoption matter most.
- +4.7Adoption: 35.5k weekly downloads against 2.6k
- +0.8Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago
Where they differ
1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Avoid Ai Writing and Claude Mem, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Avoid Ai Writingconorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing | Claude Memthedotmack/claude-mem |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 88.1 | 90.2 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #7 | #4 |
| Rank in Agent Skills | #7 | #4 |
| GitHub stars | 5.5k | 115.5k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.1 / 10 | 4.6 / 10 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | 3k/wk | 36k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 18.3 | 17.8 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.5 | 12.4 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.2 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 13.5 | 18.2 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | 1 — Anthropic | 1 — Anthropic |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | plugins | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →