Registry › Compare › Avoid Ai Writing vs Claude Mem

Avoid Ai Writing vs Claude Mem

Both are Grade A and 2.1 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Avoid Ai Writing leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; Claude Mem leads on maintenance and adoption.

Skill that audits and rewrites content to remove AI writing patterns. Use it with your favorite agents including Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, and Hermes.

conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing · #7 overall · #7 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Avoid Ai Writing if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

  • +2.1Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.1 against 4.6
  • +0.5Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.1 against 4.6
A Claude Mem 90.2

Persistent Context Across Sessions for Every Agent – Captures everything your agent does during sessions, compresses it with AI, and injects relevant context back into future sessions. Works with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, Gemini, Hermes, Copilot, OpenCode + More

thedotmack/claude-mem · #4 overall · #4 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Claude Mem if maintenance and adoption matter most.

  • +4.7Adoption: 35.5k weekly downloads against 2.6k
  • +0.8Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago

Where they differ

18.3
Safety / IntegrityAvoid Ai Writing +0.5
17.8
14.5
TransparencyAvoid Ai Writing +2.1
12.4
19.2
MaintenanceClaude Mem +0.8
20.0
13.5
AdoptionClaude Mem +4.7
18.2
+4.6
Runtime calibrationAvoid Ai Writing +0.8
+3.8

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Avoid Ai Writing and Claude Mem, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal Avoid Ai Writingconorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing Claude Memthedotmack/claude-mem
HVTrust score 88.1 90.2
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #7 #4
Rank in Agent Skills #7 #4
GitHub stars 5.5k 115.5k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.1 / 10 4.6 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 3k/wk 36k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.3 17.8
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.5 12.4
Maintenance / 20 19.2 20.0
Adoption / 20 13.5 18.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Avoid Ai Writing profile Claude Mem profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →