updated 2026-10-21 20:07 UTC
Registry › Compare › Avoid Ai Writing vs Cc Safety Net

Avoid Ai Writing vs Cc Safety Net

Both are Grade A and 1.0 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Avoid Ai Writing leads on transparency; Cc Safety Net leads on supply-chain integrity.

A Avoid Ai Writing 88.1

Skill that audits and rewrites content to remove AI writing patterns. Use it with your favorite agents including Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, and Hermes.

conorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing · #6 overall · #6 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Avoid Ai Writing if transparency matters most.

  • +1.0Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.1 against 5.9
A Cc Safety Net 87.1

A pre-execution guard for AI coding agents. It blocks destructive Git and file system commands, plus common attempts to access sensitive files, before a tool call runs. Supports Amp Code, Antigravity CLI, Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, DeepSeek Harness, Devin CLI, GitHub Copilot CLI, Grok Build…

kenryu42/cc-safety-net · #7 overall · #7 Agent Skills · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Cc Safety Net if supply-chain integrity matters most.

  • +1.5Safety / Integrity: 93% of recent commits signed, against 33%

Where they differ

18.0
Safety / IntegrityCc Safety Net +1.5
19.5
14.5
TransparencyAvoid Ai Writing +1.0
13.5
19.9
MaintenanceCc Safety Net +0.1
20.0
13.1
AdoptionCc Safety Net +0.2
13.3
+4.6
Runtime calibrationAvoid Ai Writing +1.8
+2.8

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Avoid Ai Writing and Cc Safety Net, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal Avoid Ai Writingconorbronsdon/avoid-ai-writing Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net
HVTrust score 88.1 87.1
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #6 #7
Rank in Agent Skills #6 #7
GitHub stars 5.2k 1.7k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.1 / 10 5.9 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 1k/wk 15k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.0 19.5
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.5 13.5
Maintenance / 20 19.9 20.0
Adoption / 20 13.1 13.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented —
External providers 1 — Anthropic 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Avoid Ai Writing profile Cc Safety Net profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →