RegistryCompare › autoMate vs Cua

autoMate vs Cua

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of autoMate and Cua, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Cua leads on trust — 93.9/100 (Grade A) vs 20.3/100 (Grade D), a 73.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal autoMateyuruotong1/autoMate Cuatrycua/cua
HVTrust score 20.3 93.9
Evidence grade D A
Overall rank #111 #13
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #3 #1
GitHub stars 3.9k 19.4k
Last updated 66d ago today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.0 / 10 2.9 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 11k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 8.3 6.9
Identity & provenance / 20 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 11.9 11.0
Maintenance / 20 7.6 20.0
Adoption / 20 8.6 15.7
Open in the live compare tool → autoMate profile Cua profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.1 →