RegistryCompare › AstrBot vs Rasa

AstrBot vs Rasa

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AstrBot and Rasa, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

AstrBot leads on trust — 64.0/100 (Grade C) vs 59.8/100 (Grade C), a 4.2-point gap. Note: AstrBot's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage C vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
Signal AstrBotAstrBotDevs/AstrBot RasaRasaHQ/rasa
HVTrust score 64.0 59.8
Evidence grade C C
Coverage grade C A
Overall rank #168 #222
Rank in Voice & Conversational #3 #5
GitHub stars 38.6k 21.3k
Last updated today 11d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.3 / 10 5.2 / 10
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads 69k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.2 6.5
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 13.0 12.9
Maintenance / 20 20.0 11.3
Adoption / 20 11.0 16.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI 3 — Amazon Bedrock, Postgres, Redis
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface marketplace plugins
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → AstrBot profile Rasa profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →