Registry › Compare › AstrBot vs Qwen Audio Agent

AstrBot vs Qwen Audio Agent

Qwen Audio Agent leads on trust: 86.7/100 (Grade A) against 66.0/100 (Grade B), a 20.7-point gap. AstrBot leads on maintenance; Qwen Audio Agent leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.

B AstrBot 66.0

AI Agent Assistant & development framework that integrates lots of IM platforms, LLMs, plugins and AI feature, and can be your openclaw alternative. ✨

AstrBotDevs/AstrBot · #496 overall · #4 Voice & Conversational · coverage C (2/5)

Choose AstrBot if maintenance matters most.

  • +1.9Maintenance: last push today, against 3d ago

A realtime voice runtime that keeps Agents talking, working, and present. Real-time Voice Runtime for AI Agents

QwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent · #80 overall · #3 Voice & Conversational · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Qwen Audio Agent if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

  • +8.2Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.6 against 5.6
  • +7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
  • +0.9Adoption
  • +0.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.6 against 5.6

Where they differ

12.0
Safety / IntegrityQwen Audio Agent +8.2
20.2
10.8
Identity / ProvenanceQwen Audio Agent +7.2
18.0
13.3
TransparencyQwen Audio Agent +0.8
14.1
20.0
MaintenanceAstrBot +1.9
18.1
11.2
AdoptionQwen Audio Agent +0.9
12.1
-1.3
Runtime calibrationQwen Audio Agent +5.5
+4.2

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AstrBot and Qwen Audio Agent, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal AstrBotAstrBotDevs/AstrBot Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent
HVTrust score 66.0 86.7
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade C B
Overall rank #496 #80
Rank in Voice & Conversational #4 #3
GitHub stars 46.9k 3.2k
Last updated today 3d ago
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10 6.6 / 10
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads — 536/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.0 20.2
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.3 14.1
Maintenance / 20 20.0 18.1
Adoption / 20 11.2 12.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server — Implemented
External providers 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI —
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins —
Provenance drift — Match
Open in the live compare tool → AstrBot profile Qwen Audio Agent profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →