AstrBot vs Qwen Audio Agent
Qwen Audio Agent leads on trust: 86.7/100 (Grade A) against 66.0/100 (Grade B), a 20.7-point gap. AstrBot leads on maintenance; Qwen Audio Agent leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.
AI Agent Assistant & development framework that integrates lots of IM platforms, LLMs, plugins and AI feature, and can be your openclaw alternative. ✨
Choose AstrBot if maintenance matters most.
- +1.9Maintenance: last push today, against 3d ago
A realtime voice runtime that keeps Agents talking, working, and present. Real-time Voice Runtime for AI Agents
Choose Qwen Audio Agent if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.
- +8.2Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.6 against 5.6
- +7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
- +0.9Adoption
- +0.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.6 against 5.6
Where they differ
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AstrBot and Qwen Audio Agent, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | AstrBotAstrBotDevs/AstrBot | Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 66.0 | 86.7 |
| Evidence grade | B | A |
| Coverage grade | C | B |
| Overall rank | #496 | #80 |
| Rank in Voice & Conversational | #4 | #3 |
| GitHub stars | 46.9k | 3.2k |
| Last updated | today | 3d ago |
| Build provenance | No | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.6 / 10 | 6.6 / 10 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | — | 536/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 12.0 | 20.2 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.3 | 14.1 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 18.1 |
| Adoption / 20 | 11.2 | 12.1 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI | — |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | plugins | — |
| Provenance drift | — | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →