Registry › Compare › AstrBot vs Qwen Audio Agent

AstrBot vs Qwen Audio Agent

Qwen Audio Agent leads on trust: 86.0/100 (Grade A) against 65.5/100 (Grade B), a 20.5-point gap. Qwen Audio Agent leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.

B AstrBot 65.5

AI Agent Assistant & development framework that integrates lots of IM platforms, LLMs, plugins and AI feature, and can be your openclaw alternative. ✨

AstrBotDevs/AstrBot · #453 overall · #4 Voice & Conversational · coverage C (2/5)

AstrBot doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A Qwen Audio Agent 86.0

A realtime voice runtime that keeps Agents talking, working, and present. Real-time Voice Runtime for AI Agents

QwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent · #71 overall · #2 Voice & Conversational · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Qwen Audio Agent if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.2Safety / Integrity: package provenance attested, against none
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

Where they differ

11.7

Safety / IntegrityQwen Audio Agent +7.2

18.9

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceQwen Audio Agent +7.2

18.0

20.0

MaintenanceAstrBot +0.2

19.8

11.1

AdoptionQwen Audio Agent +0.4

11.5

-1.3

Runtime calibrationQwen Audio Agent +5.9

+4.6

1 dimension identical: Transparency 13.2 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AstrBot and Qwen Audio Agent, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	AstrBotAstrBotDevs/AstrBot	Qwen Audio AgentQwenAudio/qwen-audio-agent
HVTrust score	65.5	86.0
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	C	B
Overall rank	#453	#71
Rank in Voice & Conversational	#4	#2
GitHub stars	41.3k	2.8k
Last updated	today	3d ago
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.5 / 10	5.5 / 10
License	AGPL-3.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	247/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	11.7	18.9
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.2	13.2
Maintenance / 20	20.0	19.8
Adoption / 20	11.1	11.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Implemented
External providers	3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI	—
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → AstrBot profile Qwen Audio Agent profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →