Registry › Compare › AstrBot vs LiveKit Agents

AstrBot vs LiveKit Agents

LiveKit Agents leads on trust: 91.7/100 (Grade A) against 65.6/100 (Grade B), a 26.1-point gap. LiveKit Agents leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.

B AstrBot 65.6

AI Agent Assistant & development framework that integrates lots of IM platforms, LLMs, plugins and AI feature, and can be your openclaw alternative. ✨

AstrBotDevs/AstrBot · #465 overall · #4 Voice & Conversational · coverage C (2/5)

AstrBot doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

A LiveKit Agents 91.7

A framework for building realtime voice AI agents 🤖🎙️📹

livekit/agents · #11 overall · #1 Voice & Conversational · coverage B (3/5)

Choose LiveKit Agents if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+8.4Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 98%
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+6.9Adoption
+0.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.2 against 5.5

Where they differ

11.8

Safety / IntegrityLiveKit Agents +8.4

20.2

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceLiveKit Agents +7.2

18.0

13.2

TransparencyLiveKit Agents +0.6

13.8

11.1

AdoptionLiveKit Agents +6.9

18.0

-1.3

Runtime calibrationLiveKit Agents +3.0

+1.7

1 dimension identical: Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AstrBot and LiveKit Agents, two Voice & Conversational projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	AstrBotAstrBotDevs/AstrBot	LiveKit Agentslivekit/agents
HVTrust score	65.6	91.7
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	C	B
Overall rank	#465	#11
Rank in Voice & Conversational	#4	#1
GitHub stars	41.6k	14.7k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.5 / 10	6.2 / 10
License	AGPL-3.0	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	1.1M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	11.8	20.2
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.2	13.8
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	11.1	18.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Implemented
External providers	3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI	1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → AstrBot profile LiveKit Agents profile More Voice & Conversational →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →