ASM vs Eve
Eve leads on trust: 67.1/100 (Grade B) against 62.6/100 (Grade C), a 4.5-point gap. Eve leads on maintenance and adoption.
The universal skill manager for AI coding agents.
ASM doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.
The Open Framework for Building Agents
Choose Eve if maintenance and adoption matter most.
- +1.9Adoption: 5.9k GitHub stars against 974
- +1.6Maintenance
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Safety 12.4 · Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of ASM and Eve, two Needs review projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | ASMluongnv89/asm | Evevercel/eve |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 62.6 | 67.1 |
| Evidence grade | C | B |
| Coverage grade | C | C |
| Overall rank | #628 | #462 |
| Rank in Needs review | #4 | #1 |
| GitHub stars | 974 | 5.9k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | No | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.3 / 10 | 5.9 / 10 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | — | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 12.4 | 12.4 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.9 | 13.5 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 18.3 | 19.9 |
| Adoption / 20 | 7.2 | 9.1 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | — | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | — | extensions |
| Provenance drift | — | — |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →