Registry › Compare › ASM vs Eve

ASM vs Eve

Eve leads on trust: 66.6/100 (Grade B) against 64.2/100 (Grade C), a 2.4-point gap. ASM leads on transparency and supply-chain integrity; Eve leads on adoption and maintenance.

C ASM 64.2

The universal skill manager for AI coding agents.

luongnv89/asm · #505 overall · #3 Needs review · coverage C (2/5)

Choose ASM if transparency and supply-chain integrity matter most.

+1.0Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.8 against 5.7
+0.7Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.8 against 5.7

B Eve 66.6

The Open Framework for Building Agents

vercel/eve · #420 overall · #1 Needs review · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Eve if adoption and maintenance matter most.

+1.9Adoption: 5.4k GitHub stars against 945
+0.8Maintenance: last push today, against 3d ago

Where they differ

12.8

Safety / IntegrityASM +0.7

12.1

14.3

TransparencyASM +1.0

13.3

19.2

MaintenanceEve +0.8

20.0

7.1

AdoptionEve +1.9

9.0

+0.0

Runtime calibrationEve +1.4

+1.4

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of ASM and Eve, two Needs review projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	ASMluongnv89/asm	Evevercel/eve
HVTrust score	64.2	66.6
Evidence grade	C	B
Coverage grade	C	C
Overall rank	#505	#420
Rank in Needs review	#3	#1
GitHub stars	945	5.4k
Last updated	3d ago	today
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	6.8 / 10	5.7 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	12.8	12.1
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	14.3	13.3
Maintenance / 20	19.2	20.0
Adoption / 20	7.1	9.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	—	Implemented
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	—	extensions
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → ASM profile Eve profile More Needs review →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →