RegistryCompare › Arize Phoenix vs Evidently

Arize Phoenix vs Evidently

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Arize Phoenix and Evidently, two Observability & Evaluation projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Evidently leads on trust — 76.3/100 (Grade B) vs 76.1/100 (Grade B), a 0.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Arize PhoenixArize-AI/phoenix Evidentlyevidentlyai/evidently
HVTrust score 76.1 76.3
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade A A
Overall rank #73 #71
Rank in Observability & Evaluation #5 #4
GitHub stars 10.9k 7.8k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 3.3 / 10
License NOASSERTION Apache-2.0
Downloads 529k/wk 296k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 12.2 16.1
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 8.5 11.3
Maintenance / 20 20.0 12.0
Adoption / 20 17.3 16.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 8 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, E2B, … 2 — OpenAI, Postgres
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Partial Match
Open in the live compare tool → Arize Phoenix profile Evidently profile More Observability & Evaluation →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →