Registry › Compare › Argent vs Skyvern

Argent vs Skyvern

Both are Grade A and 2.5 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Argent leads on adoption; Skyvern leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency, and rests on broader evidence. Note: Argent's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

A Argent 89.8

An agentic toolkit to control, debug, and profile iOS and Android apps. Made by Software Mansion.

software-mansion/argent · #32 overall · #7 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Argent if adoption matters most.

+0.6Adoption: 265.3k weekly downloads against 2.3k

A Skyvern 87.3

Automate browser based workflows with AI

Skyvern-AI/skyvern · #69 overall · #8 Browser & Computer Use · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Skyvern if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+2.6Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 96%
+1.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.4 against 5.4
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

Where they differ

19.1

Safety / IntegritySkyvern +2.6

21.7

13.1

TransparencySkyvern +1.7

14.8

15.6

AdoptionArgent +0.6

15.0

+4.0

Runtime calibrationArgent +6.2

-2.2

2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Argent and Skyvern, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Argentsoftware-mansion/argent	SkyvernSkyvern-AI/skyvern
HVTrust score	89.8	87.3
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	A
Overall rank	#32	#69
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#7	#8
GitHub stars	3.2k	23.4k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.4 / 10	7.4 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	AGPL-3.0
Downloads	265k/wk	2k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.1	21.7
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.1	14.8
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	15.6	15.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	5 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), …
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Unknown

Open in the live compare tool → Argent profile Skyvern profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →