Registry › Compare › Argent vs Browser Harness

Argent vs Browser Harness

Both are Grade A and 0.5 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Argent leads on supply-chain integrity and maintenance; Browser Harness leads on adoption and transparency.

A Argent 89.3

An agentic toolkit to control, debug, and profile iOS and Android apps. Made by Software Mansion.

software-mansion/argent · #26 overall · #3 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Argent if supply-chain integrity and maintenance matter most.

+2.2Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 41%
+1.0Maintenance: last push 1d ago, against 14d ago

A Browser Harness 89.8

Browser Harness | Self-healing harness that enables LLMs to complete any task.

browser-use/browser-harness · #21 overall · #2 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Browser Harness if adoption and transparency matter most.

+3.4Adoption: 1.4M weekly downloads against 100.9k
+0.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.0 against 5.4

Where they differ

19.2

Safety / IntegrityArgent +2.2

17.0

13.1

TransparencyBrowser Harness +0.5

13.6

19.9

MaintenanceArgent +1.0

18.9

15.0

AdoptionBrowser Harness +3.4

18.4

+4.1

Runtime calibrationArgent +0.2

+3.9

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Argent and Browser Harness, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Argentsoftware-mansion/argent	Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness
HVTrust score	89.3	89.8
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#26	#21
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#3	#2
GitHub stars	2.9k	18.1k
Last updated	1d ago	14d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.4 / 10	6.0 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	101k/wk	1.4M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.2	17.0
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.1	13.6
Maintenance / 20	19.9	18.9
Adoption / 20	15.0	18.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Argent profile Browser Harness profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →