RegistryCompare › Argent vs Browser Harness

Argent vs Browser Harness

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Argent and Browser Harness, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Harness leads on trust — 90.8/100 (Grade A) vs 89.1/100 (Grade A), a 1.7-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Argentsoftware-mansion/argent Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness
HVTrust score 89.1 90.8
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #23 #9
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #3 #1
GitHub stars 2.8k 17.5k
Last updated 2d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.4 / 10 6.2 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 52k/wk 1.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.2 17.3
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.1 13.8
Maintenance / 20 19.9 19.9
Adoption / 20 14.6 18.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Argent profile Browser Harness profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →