Registry › Compare › ARC-1 vs LinkedIn MCP Server

ARC-1 vs LinkedIn MCP Server

Both score 88.4/100, so choose on what you weigh most. ARC-1 leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; LinkedIn MCP Server leads on adoption.

A ARC-1 88.4

arc-mcp/arc-1 · #56 overall · #16 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose ARC-1 if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+2.3Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 98%
+1.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.0 against 5.2

A LinkedIn MCP Server 88.4

Open-source MCP server for LinkedIn. Give Claude and any MCP-compatible AI agent access to profiles, companies, jobs, and messages.

stickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-server · #57 overall · #17 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose LinkedIn MCP Server if adoption matters most.

+3.6Adoption: 9.6k weekly downloads against 3.1k

Where they differ

21.2

Safety / IntegrityARC-1 +2.3

18.9

14.4

TransparencyARC-1 +1.5

12.9

19.9

MaintenanceLinkedIn MCP Server +0.1

20.0

10.4

AdoptionLinkedIn MCP Server +3.6

14.0

+4.5

Runtime calibrationLinkedIn MCP Server +0.1

+4.6

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of ARC-1 and LinkedIn MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	ARC-1arc-mcp/arc-1	LinkedIn MCP Serverstickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-server
HVTrust score	88.4	88.4
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#56	#57
Rank in MCP Servers	#16	#17
GitHub stars	256	4.2k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	7.0 / 10	5.2 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	3k/wk	10k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	21.2	18.9
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.4	12.9
Maintenance / 20	19.9	20.0
Adoption / 20	10.4	14.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	1 — Anthropic	1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → ARC-1 profile LinkedIn MCP Server profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →