RegistryCompare › ARC-1 vs Canvas MCP

ARC-1 vs Canvas MCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of ARC-1 and Canvas MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

ARC-1 and Canvas MCP are tied on HVTrust at 87.4/100. Full breakdown below.
Signal ARC-1arc-mcp/arc-1 Canvas MCPvishalsachdev/canvas-mcp
HVTrust score 87.4 87.4
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #39 #38
Rank in MCP Servers #8 #7
GitHub stars 190 238
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 7.0 / 10 7.7 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 2k/wk 287/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 21.2 21.4
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.4 15.0
Maintenance / 20 19.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 9.8 9.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → ARC-1 profile Canvas MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →