RegistryCompare › Apify MCP Server vs Playwright MCP

Apify MCP Server vs Playwright MCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Apify MCP Server and Playwright MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Playwright MCP leads on trust — 89.6/100 (Grade A) vs 84.8/100 (Grade A), a 4.8-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Apify MCP Serverapify/apify-mcp-server Playwright MCPmicrosoft/playwright-mcp
HVTrust score 84.8 89.6
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #28 #8
Rank in MCP Servers #2 #1
GitHub stars 1.9k 35.0k
Last updated 1d ago 4d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.4 / 10 6.6 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 6k/wk 6.4M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.0 20.6
Identity & provenance / 20 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.2 14.1
Maintenance / 20 19.5 13.7
Adoption / 20 12.9 20.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — OpenAI
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface extensions extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Apify MCP Server profile Playwright MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →