Registry › Compare › Apify MCP Server vs LinkedIn MCP Server

Apify MCP Server vs LinkedIn MCP Server

Both score 89.1/100, so choose on what you weigh most. Apify MCP Server leads on adoption.

A Apify MCP Server 89.1

The Apify MCP server enables your AI agents to extract data from social media, search engines, maps, e-commerce sites, or any other website using thousands of ready-made scrapers, crawlers, and automation tools available on the Apify Store.

apify/apify-mcp-server · #33 overall · #6 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Apify MCP Server if adoption matters most.

+1.6Adoption: 35.3k weekly downloads against 13.7k

A LinkedIn MCP Server 89.1

Open-source MCP server for LinkedIn. Give Claude and any MCP-compatible AI agent access to profiles, companies, jobs, and messages.

stickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-server · #32 overall · #5 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

LinkedIn MCP Server doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

19.4

Safety / IntegrityLinkedIn MCP Server +0.1

19.5

13.2

TransparencyLinkedIn MCP Server +0.1

13.3

19.6

MaintenanceLinkedIn MCP Server +0.4

20.0

15.7

AdoptionApify MCP Server +1.6

14.1

+3.2

Runtime calibrationLinkedIn MCP Server +1.0

+4.2

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Apify MCP Server and LinkedIn MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Apify MCP Serverapify/apify-mcp-server	LinkedIn MCP Serverstickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-server
HVTrust score	89.1	89.1
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#33	#32
Rank in MCP Servers	#6	#5
GitHub stars	10.5k	3.8k
Last updated	2d ago	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.5 / 10	5.7 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	35k/wk	14k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	19.4	19.5
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.2	13.3
Maintenance / 20	19.6	20.0
Adoption / 20	15.7	14.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	—
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	—	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Apify MCP Server profile LinkedIn MCP Server profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →