Apify MCP Server vs LinkedIn MCP Server
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Apify MCP Server and LinkedIn MCP Server, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
LinkedIn MCP Server leads on trust — 86.9/100 (Grade A) vs 57.8/100 (Grade C), a 29.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | Apify MCP Serverapify/apify-mcp-server | LinkedIn MCP Serverstickerdaniel/linkedin-mcp-server |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 57.8 | 86.9 |
| Evidence grade | C | A |
| Coverage grade | C | B |
| Overall rank | #383 | #31 |
| Rank in MCP Servers | #130 | #5 |
| GitHub stars | 5.0k | 3.2k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.5 / 10 | 4.9 / 10 |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Downloads | — | 13k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.4 | 18.0 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.2 | 12.7 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.7 | 19.5 |
| Adoption / 20 | 8.9 | 13.9 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 1 — Anthropic |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | — | extensions |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
Open in the live compare tool →
Apify MCP Server profile
LinkedIn MCP Server profile
More MCP Servers →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →