Apify MCP Server vs KiCad MCP Pro
Both are Grade A and 1.1 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Apify MCP Server leads on adoption; KiCad MCP Pro leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.
The Apify MCP server enables your AI agents to extract data from social media, search engines, maps, e-commerce sites, or any other website using thousands of ready-made scrapers, crawlers, and automation tools available on the Apify Store.
Choose Apify MCP Server if adoption matters most.
- +5.7Adoption: 37.4k weekly downloads against 5.6k
MCP server for KiCad, connecting AI agents to schematic and PCB workflows, ERC/DRC validation, DFM checks, BOM analysis, and manufacturing preparation—with controlled edits and human-gated release workflows.
Choose KiCad MCP Pro if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.
- +2.9Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 8.5 against 5.5
- +2.5Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 8.5 against 5.5
Where they differ
2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Apify MCP Server and KiCad MCP Pro, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Full evidence
| Signal | Apify MCP Serverapify/apify-mcp-server | KiCad MCP Prooaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 89.4 | 88.3 |
| Evidence grade | A | A |
| Coverage grade | B | B |
| Overall rank | #29 | #38 |
| Rank in MCP Servers | #4 | #7 |
| GitHub stars | 10.3k | 120 |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | Yes | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 5.5 / 10 | 8.5 / 10 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Downloads | 37k/wk | 6k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 19.4 | 22.3 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 13.2 | 15.7 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 15.7 | 10.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Implemented | Implemented |
| External providers | — | 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | Yes | No |
| Plugin surface | — | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →