RegistryCompare › Apify MCP Server vs Bright Data MCP

Apify MCP Server vs Bright Data MCP

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Apify MCP Server and Bright Data MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Apify MCP Server leads on trust — 88.6/100 (Grade A) vs 75.0/100 (Grade B), a 13.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Apify MCP Serverapify/apify-mcp-server Bright Data MCPbrightdata/brightdata-mcp
HVTrust score 88.6 75.0
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #33 #228
Rank in MCP Servers #7 #135
GitHub stars 7.7k 2.7k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10 3.8 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 24k/wk 7k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.4 13.7
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.2 11.7
Maintenance / 20 19.4 13.6
Adoption / 20 15.2 13.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Apify MCP Server profile Bright Data MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →