Registry › Compare › Apify MCP Server vs Bright Data MCP

Apify MCP Server vs Bright Data MCP

Apify MCP Server leads on trust: 89.6/100 (Grade A) against 80.7/100 (Grade A), a 8.9-point gap. Apify MCP Server leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

The Apify MCP server enables your AI agents to extract data from social media, search engines, maps, e-commerce sites, or any other website using thousands of ready-made scrapers, crawlers, and automation tools available on the Apify Store.

apify/apify-mcp-server · #31 overall · #6 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Apify MCP Server if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

  • +6.4Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 18%
  • +2.2Adoption: 30.5k weekly downloads against 15.7k
  • +1.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.5 against 3.7

A powerful Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that provides an all-in-one solution for public web access.

brightdata/brightdata-mcp · #162 overall · #78 MCP Servers · coverage B (3/5)

Bright Data MCP doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

19.4
Safety / IntegrityApify MCP Server +6.4
13.0
13.2
TransparencyApify MCP Server +1.6
11.6
19.9
MaintenanceApify MCP Server +0.3
19.6
16.0
AdoptionApify MCP Server +2.2
13.8
+3.1
Runtime calibrationBright Data MCP +1.6
+4.7

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Apify MCP Server and Bright Data MCP, two MCP Servers projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal Apify MCP Serverapify/apify-mcp-server Bright Data MCPbrightdata/brightdata-mcp
HVTrust score 89.6 80.7
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #31 #162
Rank in MCP Servers #6 #78
GitHub stars 14.4k 2.7k
Last updated 1d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.5 / 10 3.7 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 31k/wk 16k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 19.4 13.0
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.2 11.6
Maintenance / 20 19.9 19.6
Adoption / 20 16.0 13.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers — —
Requires API keys Yes Yes
Plugin surface — —
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Apify MCP Server profile Bright Data MCP profile More MCP Servers →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →