RegistryCompare › Antigravity Sdk Python vs Cc Safety Net

Antigravity Sdk Python vs Cc Safety Net

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Antigravity Sdk Python and Cc Safety Net, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Cc Safety Net leads on trust — 86.4/100 (Grade A) vs 82.4/100 (Grade A), a 4.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Antigravity Sdk Pythongoogle-antigravity/antigravity-sdk-python Cc Safety Netkenryu42/cc-safety-net
HVTrust score 82.4 86.4
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #6 #3
Rank in Agent Skills #6 #3
GitHub stars 3.3k 1.5k
Last updated 7d ago 1d ago
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.0 / 10 6.0 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 152k/wk 2k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 13.8 19.9
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.8 13.6
Maintenance / 20 19.5 19.9
Adoption / 20 15.3 12.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared
External providers 1 — Google Gemini 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Antigravity Sdk Python profile Cc Safety Net profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →