Registry › Compare › AiSOC vs Snyk Agent Scan

AiSOC vs Snyk Agent Scan

AiSOC leads on trust: 87.4/100 (Grade A) against 63.6/100 (Grade C), a 23.8-point gap. AiSOC leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance, and rests on broader evidence.

A AiSOC 87.4

Open-source AI Security Operations Center: alert fusion, LLM-agent triage, MITRE ATT&CK investigation, and a replayable decision ledger for every agent step. Self-hostable, runs with no API keys, MIT licensed. Ships an MCP server for Claude, Cursor and Continue.

beenuar/AiSOC · #55 overall · #3 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

Choose AiSOC if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+8.1Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.3 against 5.7
+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+3.3Adoption
+2.0Maintenance: last push today, against 3d ago

C Snyk Agent Scan 63.6

Security scanner for AI agents, MCP servers and agent skills.

snyk/agent-scan · #551 overall · #8 Security & Guardrails · coverage C (2/5)

Snyk Agent Scan doesn't lead on any scored dimension in this pair.

Where they differ

20.2

Safety / IntegrityAiSOC +8.1

12.1

18.0

Identity / ProvenanceAiSOC +7.2

10.8

13.9

TransparencyAiSOC +0.6

13.3

20.0

MaintenanceAiSOC +2.0

18.0

11.7

AdoptionAiSOC +3.3

8.4

+3.6

Runtime calibrationAiSOC +2.6

+1.0

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AiSOC and Snyk Agent Scan, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	AiSOCbeenuar/AiSOC	Snyk Agent Scansnyk/agent-scan
HVTrust score	87.4	63.6
Evidence grade	A	C
Coverage grade	B	C
Overall rank	#55	#551
Rank in Security & Guardrails	#3	#8
GitHub stars	2.4k	3.1k
Last updated	today	3d ago
Build provenance	Yes	No
OSSF Scorecard	6.3 / 10	5.7 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	475/wk	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	20.2	12.1
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	10.8
Transparency / 17	13.9	13.3
Maintenance / 20	20.0	18.0
Adoption / 20	11.7	8.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	—

Open in the live compare tool → AiSOC profile Snyk Agent Scan profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →