Registry › Compare › AiSOC vs REA

AiSOC vs REA

Both are Grade A and 1.9 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. AiSOC leads on supply-chain integrity; REA leads on adoption.

A AiSOC 84.9

Open-source AI Security Operations Center: alert fusion, LLM-agent triage, MITRE ATT&CK investigation, and a replayable decision ledger for every agent step. Self-hostable, runs with no API keys, MIT licensed. Ships an MCP server for Claude, Cursor and Continue.

beenuar/AiSOC · #93 overall · #3 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

Choose AiSOC if supply-chain integrity matters most.

  • +1.3Safety / Integrity: 63% of recent commits signed, against 41%
A REA 86.8

Reverse engineer anything with agents, from app behavior down to native binaries.

morluto/rea · #64 overall · #2 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

Choose REA if adoption matters most.

  • +3.7Adoption: 1.3k weekly downloads against 316

Where they differ

17.6
Safety / IntegrityAiSOC +1.3
16.3
13.3
TransparencyAiSOC +0.2
13.1
11.4
AdoptionREA +3.7
15.1
+4.6
Runtime calibrationAiSOC +0.3
+4.3

2 dimensions identical: Identity 18.0 · Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AiSOC and REA, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal AiSOCbeenuar/AiSOC REAmorluto/rea
HVTrust score 84.9 86.8
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #93 #64
Rank in Security & Guardrails #3 #2
GitHub stars 2.4k 34.9k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 5.6 / 10 5.4 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 316/wk 1k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.6 16.3
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.3 13.1
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 11.4 15.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers — —
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → AiSOC profile REA profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →