Registry › Compare › AiSOC vs DvalinCode

AiSOC vs DvalinCode

Both are Grade A and 1.6 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. AiSOC leads on maintenance and adoption; DvalinCode leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

A AiSOC 84.9

Open-source AI Security Operations Center: alert fusion, LLM-agent triage, MITRE ATT&CK investigation, and a replayable decision ledger for every agent step. Self-hostable, runs with no API keys, MIT licensed. Ships an MCP server for Claude, Cursor and Continue.

beenuar/AiSOC · #93 overall · #3 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

Choose AiSOC if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+3.9Adoption: 316 weekly downloads against 77
+0.8Maintenance

A DvalinCode 83.3

Independent security verification for code written by humans and AI agents. Scan, repair, then prove it — Dvalin runs your project's own checks and issues a Verified Fix Record anyone can re-derive offline. Local-first, policy-bound, MIT.

arthurpanhku/dvalincode · #112 overall · #4 Security & Guardrails · coverage B (3/5)

Choose DvalinCode if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+2.4Safety / Integrity: 89% of recent commits signed, against 63%
+0.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.4 against 5.6

Where they differ

17.6

Safety / IntegrityDvalinCode +2.4

20.0

13.3

TransparencyDvalinCode +0.6

13.9

20.0

MaintenanceAiSOC +0.8

19.2

11.4

AdoptionAiSOC +3.9

7.5

+4.6

Runtime calibrationDvalinCode +0.1

+4.7

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of AiSOC and DvalinCode, two Security & Guardrails projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	AiSOCbeenuar/AiSOC	DvalinCodearthurpanhku/dvalincode
HVTrust score	84.9	83.3
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#93	#112
Rank in Security & Guardrails	#3	#4
GitHub stars	2.4k	120
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	5.6 / 10	6.4 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	316/wk	77/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	17.6	20.0
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	13.3	13.9
Maintenance / 20	20.0	19.2
Adoption / 20	11.4	7.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	—	1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → AiSOC profile DvalinCode profile More Security & Guardrails →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →