RegistryCompare › Airbyte vs Trigger.dev

Airbyte vs Trigger.dev

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Airbyte and Trigger.dev, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Trigger.dev leads on trust — 87.6/100 (Grade A) vs 66.4/100 (Grade B), a 21.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Airbyteairbytehq/airbyte Trigger.devtriggerdotdev/trigger.dev
HVTrust score 66.4 87.6
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade C B
Overall rank #420 #42
Rank in Workflow Platforms #9 #2
GitHub stars 22.1k 16.3k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10 5.9 / 10
License NOASSERTION Apache-2.0
Downloads 848k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.1 15.5
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.7 13.5
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 10.4 18.0
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 3 — OpenAI, Postgres, Redis
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions extensions
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Airbyte profile Trigger.dev profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →