RegistryCompare › Airbyte vs Hatchet

Airbyte vs Hatchet

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Airbyte and Hatchet, two Workflow Platforms projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Hatchet leads on trust — 67.3/100 (Grade B) vs 66.8/100 (Grade B), a 0.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Airbyteairbytehq/airbyte Hatchethatchet-dev/hatchet
HVTrust score 66.8 67.3
Evidence grade B B
Coverage grade C C
Overall rank #405 #389
Rank in Workflow Platforms #8 #7
GitHub stars 22.1k 8.0k
Last updated today today
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 5.1 / 10 6.3 / 10
License NOASSERTION MIT
Downloads
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.4 12.7
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.8 13.9
Maintenance / 20 20.0 20.0
Adoption / 20 10.4 9.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 4 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift
Open in the live compare tool → Airbyte profile Hatchet profile More Workflow Platforms →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →