Agenta vs Promptfoo
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agenta and Promptfoo, two Observability & Evaluation projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Promptfoo leads on trust — 91.7/100 (Grade A) vs 68.4/100 (Grade B), a 23.3-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | AgentaAgenta-AI/agenta | Promptfoopromptfoo/promptfoo |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 68.4 | 91.7 |
| Evidence grade | B | A |
| Coverage grade | A | A |
| Overall rank | #139 | #6 |
| Rank in Observability & Evaluation | #11 | #1 |
| GitHub stars | 4.8k | 25.3k |
| Last updated | today | today |
| Build provenance | No | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.7 / 10 | 7.4 / 10 |
| License | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Downloads | 4k/wk | 524k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 9.1 | 21.7 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.2 | 14.8 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 20.0 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 13.7 | 18.2 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | Implemented |
| External providers | 6 — Amazon Bedrock, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), … | 3 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | extensions | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →