Agenta vs Promptfoo
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agenta and Promptfoo, two Observability & Evaluation projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
Promptfoo leads on trust — 88.9/100 (Grade A) vs 70.7/100 (Grade B), a 18.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | AgentaAgenta-AI/agenta | Promptfoopromptfoo/promptfoo |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 70.7 | 88.9 |
| Evidence grade | B | A |
| Coverage grade | A | A |
| Overall rank | #125 | #19 |
| Rank in Observability & Evaluation | #9 | #2 |
| GitHub stars | 4.5k | 24.2k |
| Last updated | 1d ago | today |
| Build provenance | No | Yes |
| OSSF Scorecard | 6.7 / 10 | 7.6 / 10 |
| License | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Downloads | 3k/wk | 384k/wk |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 10.3 | 17.0 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 10.8 | 18.0 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.2 | 15.0 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 19.9 | 20.0 |
| Adoption / 20 | 13.4 | 18.0 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | Declared | Implemented |
| External providers | 3 — OpenAI, Postgres, Redis | 2 — Anthropic, OpenAI |
| Requires API keys | No | Yes |
| Plugin surface | extensions | plugins |
| Provenance drift | Match | Match |
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →