Registry › Compare › Agenta vs Evidently

Agenta vs Evidently

Evidently leads on trust: 74.8/100 (Grade B) against 69.0/100 (Grade B), a 5.8-point gap. Agenta leads on transparency and maintenance; Evidently leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance.

B Agenta 69.0

Agenta is a workspace where you and your team build agents and automations.

Agenta-AI/agenta · #394 overall · #12 Observability & Evaluation · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Agenta if transparency and maintenance matter most.

+10.3Maintenance: last push 1d ago, against 36d ago
+2.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.7 against 3.5

B Evidently 74.8

Evidently is an open-source ML and LLM observability framework. Evaluate, test, and monitor any AI-powered system or data pipeline. From tabular data to Gen AI. 100+ metrics.

evidentlyai/evidently · #265 overall · #10 Observability & Evaluation · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Evidently if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+6.4Safety / Integrity: 89% of recent commits signed, against 31%
+3.1Adoption: 196.7k weekly downloads against 2.3k

Where they differ

9.9

Safety / IntegrityEvidently +6.4

16.3

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceEvidently +7.2

18.0

14.2

TransparencyAgenta +2.7

11.5

19.9

MaintenanceAgenta +10.3

9.6

13.3

AdoptionEvidently +3.1

16.4

+0.9

Runtime calibrationEvidently +2.1

+3.0

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agenta and Evidently, two Observability & Evaluation projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	AgentaAgenta-AI/agenta	Evidentlyevidentlyai/evidently
HVTrust score	69.0	74.8
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	A	A
Overall rank	#394	#265
Rank in Observability & Evaluation	#12	#10
GitHub stars	4.9k	8.0k
Last updated	1d ago	36d ago
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	6.7 / 10	3.5 / 10
License	NOASSERTION	Apache-2.0
Downloads	2k/wk	197k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	9.9	16.3
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.2	11.5
Maintenance / 20	19.9	9.6
Adoption / 20	13.3	16.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	—
External providers	6 — Amazon Bedrock, Google Gemini, Multi-provider (LiteLLM), …	3 — Multi-provider (LiteLLM), OpenAI, Postgres
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Agenta profile Evidently profile More Observability & Evaluation →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →