Registry › Compare › agent-swarm vs TradingAgents

agent-swarm vs TradingAgents

Both are Grade B and 0.1 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. agent-swarm leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency; TradingAgents leads on adoption and rests on broader evidence.

B agent-swarm 65.7

Your Company Agentic Operating System

desplega-ai/agent-swarm · #490 overall · #10 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Choose agent-swarm if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+2.4Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 6.7 against 4.8
+1.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.7 against 4.8

B TradingAgents 65.8

TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework

TauricResearch/TradingAgents · #489 overall · #9 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose TradingAgents if adoption matters most.

+8.6Adoption: 112.5k GitHub stars against 916
B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

Where they differ

13.4

Safety / Integrityagent-swarm +2.4

11.0

14.2

Transparencyagent-swarm +1.6

12.6

20.0

Maintenanceagent-swarm +0.3

19.7

7.1

AdoptionTradingAgents +8.6

15.7

+0.2

Runtime calibrationagent-swarm +4.2

-4.0

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of agent-swarm and TradingAgents, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	agent-swarmdesplega-ai/agent-swarm	TradingAgentsTauricResearch/TradingAgents
HVTrust score	65.7	65.8
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	C	B
Overall rank	#490	#489
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#10	#9
GitHub stars	916	112.5k
Last updated	today	5d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	6.7 / 10	4.8 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	480/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	13.4	11.0
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	14.2	12.6
Maintenance / 20	20.0	19.7
Adoption / 20	7.1	15.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	4 — Anthropic, E2B, Google Gemini, …	8 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → agent-swarm profile TradingAgents profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →