Registry › Compare › agent-swarm vs OpenMausBot

agent-swarm vs OpenMausBot

OpenMausBot leads on trust: 83.8/100 (Grade A) against 65.4/100 (Grade B), a 18.4-point gap. agent-swarm leads on transparency; OpenMausBot leads on provenance and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.

B agent-swarm 65.4

Your Company Agentic Operating System

desplega-ai/agent-swarm · #484 overall · #8 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Choose agent-swarm if transparency matters most.

+2.0Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.6 against 4.2

A OpenMausBot 83.8

Open-source Grok Bot alternative with a virtual machine that bots can use

milind-soni/OpenMausBot · #107 overall · #2 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose OpenMausBot if provenance and adoption matter most.

+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+6.2Adoption: 4.7k GitHub stars against 878
+1.2Safety / Integrity: package provenance attested, against none
B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

Where they differ

13.2

Safety / IntegrityOpenMausBot +1.2

14.4

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceOpenMausBot +7.2

18.0

14.1

Transparencyagent-swarm +2.0

12.1

7.1

AdoptionOpenMausBot +6.2

13.3

+0.2

Runtime calibrationOpenMausBot +5.8

+6.0

1 dimension identical: Maintenance 20.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of agent-swarm and OpenMausBot, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	agent-swarmdesplega-ai/agent-swarm	OpenMausBotmilind-soni/OpenMausBot
HVTrust score	65.4	83.8
Evidence grade	B	A
Coverage grade	C	B
Overall rank	#484	#107
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#8	#2
GitHub stars	878	4.7k
Last updated	today	today
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	6.6 / 10	4.2 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	2k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	13.2	14.4
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	14.1	12.1
Maintenance / 20	20.0	20.0
Adoption / 20	7.1	13.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	4 — Anthropic, E2B, Google Gemini, …	—
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → agent-swarm profile OpenMausBot profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →