Registry › Compare › agent-swarm vs Concordia

agent-swarm vs Concordia

Both are Grade B and 1.4 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. agent-swarm leads on supply-chain integrity and maintenance; Concordia leads on transparency and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.

B agent-swarm 65.5

Your Company Agentic Operating System

desplega-ai/agent-swarm · #501 overall · #8 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Choose agent-swarm if supply-chain integrity and maintenance matter most.

+3.5Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 7%
+1.3Maintenance: last push today, against 2d ago

B Concordia 66.9

A library for generative social simulation

google-deepmind/concordia · #457 overall · #6 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Concordia if transparency and adoption matter most.

+4.4Adoption: 1.9k GitHub stars against 1k
+0.8Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.5 against 6.6
B vs CEvidence coverage: 3 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

Where they differ

13.2

Safety / Integrityagent-swarm +3.5

9.7

14.1

TransparencyConcordia +0.8

14.9

20.0

Maintenanceagent-swarm +1.3

18.7

7.2

AdoptionConcordia +4.4

11.6

+0.2

Runtime calibrationConcordia +1.0

+1.2

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of agent-swarm and Concordia, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	agent-swarmdesplega-ai/agent-swarm	Concordiagoogle-deepmind/concordia
HVTrust score	65.5	66.9
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	C	B
Overall rank	#501	#457
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#8	#6
GitHub stars	1.0k	1.9k
Last updated	today	2d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	6.6 / 10	7.5 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	605/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	13.2	9.7
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	14.1	14.9
Maintenance / 20	20.0	18.7
Adoption / 20	7.2	11.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Declared
External providers	4 — Anthropic, E2B, Google Gemini, …	6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys	No	No
Plugin surface	plugins	—
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → agent-swarm profile Concordia profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →