RegistryCompare › Agent Orchestrator vs Plannotator

Agent Orchestrator vs Plannotator

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Orchestrator and Plannotator, two Agent Skills projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Agent Orchestrator leads on trust — 63.9/100 (Grade C) vs 62.5/100 (Grade C), a 1.4-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agent OrchestratorUntrivial-ai/agent-orchestrator Plannotatorbacknotprop/plannotator
HVTrust score 63.9 62.5
Evidence grade C C
Coverage grade C C
Overall rank #61 #70
Rank in Agent Skills #61 #70
GitHub stars 11.9k 8.7k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.8 / 10 6.2 / 10
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Downloads
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.0 9.9
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.6 13.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 19.9
Adoption / 20 9.8 9.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift
Open in the live compare tool → Agent Orchestrator profile Plannotator profile More Agent Skills →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →