RegistryCompare › agent-device vs Stagehand

agent-device vs Stagehand

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of agent-device and Stagehand, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Stagehand leads on trust — 87.3/100 (Grade A) vs 79.2/100 (Grade B), a 8.1-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal agent-devicecallstack/agent-device Stagehandbrowserbase/stagehand
HVTrust score 79.2 87.3
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade B A
Overall rank #98 #31
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #7 #2
GitHub stars 4.3k 24.1k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.4 / 10 5.0 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 139k/wk 1.4M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 13.0 18.8
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 13.9 12.8
Maintenance / 20 19.9 19.4
Adoption / 20 15.6 18.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Declared
External providers 3 — Anthropic, Browserbase, OpenAI
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface extensions
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → agent-device profile Stagehand profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →