RegistryCompare › agent-device vs Browser Harness

agent-device vs Browser Harness

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of agent-device and Browser Harness, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Harness leads on trust — 90.8/100 (Grade A) vs 79.8/100 (Grade B), a 11.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal agent-devicecallstack/agent-device Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness
HVTrust score 79.8 90.8
Evidence grade B A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #136 #9
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #8 #1
GitHub stars 4.6k 17.5k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance No Yes
OSSF Scorecard 6.7 / 10 6.2 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads 108k/wk 1.2M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 13.3 17.3
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 18.0
Transparency / 17 14.2 13.8
Maintenance / 20 20.0 19.9
Adoption / 20 15.5 18.3
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → agent-device profile Browser Harness profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →