Registry › Compare › Agent Browser vs Camofox Browser

Agent Browser vs Camofox Browser

Agent Browser leads on trust: 87.7/100 (Grade A) against 81.7/100 (Grade A), a 6.0-point gap. Agent Browser leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption; Camofox Browser leads on maintenance.

A Agent Browser 87.7

Browser automation CLI for AI agents

vercel-labs/agent-browser · #45 overall · #5 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Agent Browser if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+4.3Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 3%
+3.7Adoption: 1.6M weekly downloads against 30.6k

A Camofox Browser 81.7

Stealth headless browser for AI agents — bypass Cloudflare, bot detection, and anti-scraping. Drop-in Puppeteer/Playwright replacement.

jo-inc/camofox-browser · #128 overall · #7 Browser & Computer Use · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Camofox Browser if maintenance matters most.

+0.8Maintenance

Where they differ

18.1

Safety / IntegrityAgent Browser +4.3

13.8

12.3

TransparencyCamofox Browser +0.4

12.7

18.3

MaintenanceCamofox Browser +0.8

19.1

19.4

AdoptionAgent Browser +3.7

15.7

+1.6

Runtime calibrationCamofox Browser +0.8

+2.4

1 dimension identical: Identity 18.0 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Browser and Camofox Browser, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Agent Browservercel-labs/agent-browser	Camofox Browserjo-inc/camofox-browser
HVTrust score	87.7	81.7
Evidence grade	A	A
Coverage grade	B	B
Overall rank	#45	#128
Rank in Browser & Computer Use	#5	#7
GitHub stars	43.2k	11.2k
Last updated	2d ago	4d ago
Build provenance	Yes	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.5 / 10	4.9 / 10
License	Apache-2.0	MIT
Downloads	1.6M/wk	31k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	18.1	13.8
Identity & provenance / 18	18.0	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.3	12.7
Maintenance / 20	18.3	19.1
Adoption / 20	19.4	15.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Declared
External providers	3 — Amazon Bedrock, Browserbase, Redis	—
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	plugins	plugins
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Agent Browser profile Camofox Browser profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →