RegistryCompare › Agent Browser vs Browser Harness

Agent Browser vs Browser Harness

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Browser and Browser Harness, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Browser Harness leads on trust — 88.7/100 (Grade A) vs 86.7/100 (Grade A), a 2.0-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agent Browservercel-labs/agent-browser Browser Harnessbrowser-use/browser-harness
HVTrust score 86.7 88.7
Evidence grade A A
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #31 #20
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #3 #1
GitHub stars 40.7k 16.7k
Last updated 1d ago today
Build provenance Yes Yes
OSSF Scorecard 4.3 / 10 6.1 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 923k/wk 3.0M/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 17.9 17.1
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 18.0
Transparency / 17 12.2 13.7
Maintenance / 20 17.6 18.6
Adoption / 20 19.0 18.8
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented
External providers 3 — Amazon Bedrock, Browserbase, Redis 1 — Anthropic
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Agent Browser profile Browser Harness profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →