RegistryCompare › Agent Browser vs agent-device

Agent Browser vs agent-device

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Browser and agent-device, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Agent Browser leads on trust — 86.4/100 (Grade A) vs 79.2/100 (Grade B), a 7.2-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agent Browservercel-labs/agent-browser agent-devicecallstack/agent-device
HVTrust score 86.4 79.2
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #46 #98
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #4 #7
GitHub stars 41.6k 4.3k
Last updated today 1d ago
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10 6.4 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 923k/wk 139k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.1 13.0
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.3 13.9
Maintenance / 20 16.9 19.9
Adoption / 20 19.0 15.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 3 — Amazon Bedrock, Browserbase, Redis
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Agent Browser profile agent-device profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →