RegistryCompare › Agent Browser vs agent-device

Agent Browser vs agent-device

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agent Browser and agent-device, two Browser & Computer Use projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Agent Browser leads on trust — 87.3/100 (Grade A) vs 79.8/100 (Grade B), a 7.5-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agent Browservercel-labs/agent-browser agent-devicecallstack/agent-device
HVTrust score 87.3 79.8
Evidence grade A B
Coverage grade B B
Overall rank #43 #136
Rank in Browser & Computer Use #5 #8
GitHub stars 42.5k 4.6k
Last updated today today
Build provenance Yes No
OSSF Scorecard 4.5 / 10 6.7 / 10
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Downloads 1.1M/wk 108k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 18.1 13.3
Identity & provenance / 18 18.0 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.3 14.2
Maintenance / 20 18.1 20.0
Adoption / 20 19.1 15.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Implemented Implemented
External providers 3 — Amazon Bedrock, Browserbase, Redis
Requires API keys Yes No
Plugin surface plugins
Provenance drift Match Match
Open in the live compare tool → Agent Browser profile agent-device profile More Browser & Computer Use →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →