Registry › Compare › Agency Swarm vs TradingAgents

Agency Swarm vs TradingAgents

Both are Grade B and 0.8 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Agency Swarm rests on broader evidence; TradingAgents leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption.

B Agency Swarm 66.6

Reliable Multi-Agent Orchestration Framework

VRSEN/agency-swarm · #467 overall · #7 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Agency Swarm if breadth of evidence matters most.

A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

B TradingAgents 65.8

TradingAgents: Multi-Agents LLM Financial Trading Framework

TauricResearch/TradingAgents · #489 overall · #9 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose TradingAgents if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+3.1Adoption: 112.5k GitHub stars against 4.6k
+2.0Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 67%
+1.3Maintenance

Where they differ

9.0

Safety / IntegrityTradingAgents +2.0

11.0

12.3

TransparencyTradingAgents +0.3

12.6

18.4

MaintenanceTradingAgents +1.3

19.7

12.6

AdoptionTradingAgents +3.1

15.7

+3.5

Runtime calibrationAgency Swarm +7.5

-4.0

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agency Swarm and TradingAgents, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Agency SwarmVRSEN/agency-swarm	TradingAgentsTauricResearch/TradingAgents
HVTrust score	66.6	65.8
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#467	#489
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#7	#9
GitHub stars	4.6k	112.5k
Last updated	today	5d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	4.5 / 10	4.8 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	778/wk	480/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	9.0	11.0
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.3	12.6
Maintenance / 20	18.4	19.7
Adoption / 20	12.6	15.7
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	—
External providers	2 — Multi-provider (LiteLLM), OpenAI	8 — Anthropic, DeepSeek, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys	Yes	Yes
Plugin surface	marketplace	—
Provenance drift	Match	—

Open in the live compare tool → Agency Swarm profile TradingAgents profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →