Registry › Compare › Agency Swarm vs OpenMausBot

Agency Swarm vs OpenMausBot

OpenMausBot leads on trust: 78.0/100 (Grade B) against 68.0/100 (Grade B), a 10.0-point gap. Agency Swarm leads on transparency and rests on broader evidence; OpenMausBot leads on supply-chain integrity and provenance. Note: OpenMausBot's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage B vs A) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types.

B Agency Swarm 68.0

Reliable Multi-Agent Orchestration Framework

VRSEN/agency-swarm · #404 overall · #5 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Agency Swarm if transparency matters most.

+3.9Transparency
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

B OpenMausBot 78.0

Open-source Grok Bot alternative with a virtual machine that bots can use

milind-soni/OpenMausBot · #191 overall · #2 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose OpenMausBot if supply-chain integrity and provenance matter most.

+7.2Identity / Provenance: package provenance attested, against none
+3.2Safety / Integrity: 99% of recent commits signed, against 69%
+0.6Maintenance: last push today, against 1d ago

Where they differ

9.2

Safety / IntegrityOpenMausBot +3.2

12.4

10.8

Identity / ProvenanceOpenMausBot +7.2

18.0

12.4

TransparencyAgency Swarm +3.9

8.5

19.4

MaintenanceOpenMausBot +0.6

20.0

12.7

AdoptionOpenMausBot +0.4

13.1

+3.5

Runtime calibrationOpenMausBot +2.5

+6.0

Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agency Swarm and OpenMausBot, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Agency SwarmVRSEN/agency-swarm	OpenMausBotmilind-soni/OpenMausBot
HVTrust score	68.0	78.0
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#404	#191
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#5	#2
GitHub stars	4.6k	4.2k
Last updated	1d ago	today
Build provenance	No	Yes
OSSF Scorecard	4.6 / 10	—
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	801/wk	2k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	9.2	12.4
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	18.0
Transparency / 17	12.4	8.5
Maintenance / 20	19.4	20.0
Adoption / 20	12.7	13.1
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Implemented
External providers	2 — Multi-provider (LiteLLM), OpenAI	—
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	marketplace	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Agency Swarm profile OpenMausBot profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →