Registry › Compare › Agency Swarm vs Concordia

Agency Swarm vs Concordia

Both are Grade B and 1.4 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Agency Swarm leads on maintenance and adoption, and rests on broader evidence; Concordia leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

B Agency Swarm 68.0

Reliable Multi-Agent Orchestration Framework

VRSEN/agency-swarm · #404 overall · #5 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage A (4/5)

Choose Agency Swarm if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+1.5Maintenance
+1.2Adoption: 801 weekly downloads against 633
A vs BEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 3

B Concordia 66.6

A library for generative social simulation

google-deepmind/concordia · #442 overall · #6 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage B (3/5)

Choose Concordia if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+2.7Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 7.8 against 4.6
+0.9Safety / Integrity: OSSF Scorecard 7.8 against 4.6

Where they differ

9.2

Safety / IntegrityConcordia +0.9

10.1

12.4

TransparencyConcordia +2.7

15.1

19.4

MaintenanceAgency Swarm +1.5

17.9

12.7

AdoptionAgency Swarm +1.2

11.5

+3.5

Runtime calibrationAgency Swarm +2.3

+1.2

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agency Swarm and Concordia, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Agency SwarmVRSEN/agency-swarm	Concordiagoogle-deepmind/concordia
HVTrust score	68.0	66.6
Evidence grade	B	B
Coverage grade	A	B
Overall rank	#404	#442
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#5	#6
GitHub stars	4.6k	1.8k
Last updated	1d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	4.6 / 10	7.8 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	801/wk	633/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	9.2	10.1
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.4	15.1
Maintenance / 20	19.4	17.9
Adoption / 20	12.7	11.5
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Implemented	Declared
External providers	2 — Multi-provider (LiteLLM), OpenAI	6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys	Yes	No
Plugin surface	marketplace	—
Provenance drift	Match	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Agency Swarm profile Concordia profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →