RegistryCompare › Agency Agents vs Open Multi-Agent

Agency Agents vs Open Multi-Agent

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agency Agents and Open Multi-Agent, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Agency Agents leads on trust — 61.6/100 (Grade C) vs 61.0/100 (Grade C), a 0.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agency Agentsmsitarzewski/agency-agents Open Multi-Agentopen-multi-agent/open-multi-agent
HVTrust score 61.6 61.0
Evidence grade C C
Coverage grade C C
Overall rank #199 #209
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems #7 #8
GitHub stars 138.5k 6.7k
Last updated 5d ago 1d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10 5.3 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.0 11.5
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.7 13.0
Maintenance / 20 17.7 19.9
Adoption / 20 12.3 9.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Declared
External providers 3 — Google Gemini, OpenAI, Postgres 4 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface marketplace plugins
Provenance drift
Open in the live compare tool → Agency Agents profile Open Multi-Agent profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.2 →