Registry › Compare › Agency Agents vs Open Multi-Agent

Agency Agents vs Open Multi-Agent

Both are Grade C and 1.6 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Agency Agents leads on maintenance and adoption; Open Multi-Agent leads on supply-chain integrity and transparency.

C Agency Agents 62.7

A complete AI agency at your fingertips - From frontend wizards to Reddit community ninjas, from whimsy injectors to reality checkers. Each agent is a specialized expert with personality, processes, and proven deliverables.

msitarzewski/agency-agents · #619 overall · #18 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Agency Agents if maintenance and adoption matter most.

+3.3Adoption: 166.7k GitHub stars against 7k
+1.5Maintenance

C Open Multi-Agent 61.1

Self-hosted TypeScript agent runtime with durable approvals and verifiable run records. Own it, approve it, audit it.

open-multi-agent/open-multi-agent · #668 overall · #20 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Open Multi-Agent if supply-chain integrity and transparency matter most.

+4.6Safety / Integrity: 100% of recent commits signed, against 25%
+0.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 5.6 against 4.9

Where they differ

7.4

Safety / IntegrityOpen Multi-Agent +4.6

12.0

12.7

TransparencyOpen Multi-Agent +0.6

13.3

19.3

MaintenanceAgency Agents +1.5

17.8

12.5

AdoptionAgency Agents +3.3

9.2

+0.0

Runtime calibrationAgency Agents +2.0

-2.0

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agency Agents and Open Multi-Agent, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Agency Agentsmsitarzewski/agency-agents	Open Multi-Agentopen-multi-agent/open-multi-agent
HVTrust score	62.7	61.1
Evidence grade	C	C
Coverage grade	C	C
Overall rank	#619	#668
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#18	#20
GitHub stars	166.7k	7.0k
Last updated	11d ago	1d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	4.9 / 10	5.6 / 10
License	MIT	MIT
Downloads	—	—
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	7.4	12.0
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.7	13.3
Maintenance / 20	19.3	17.8
Adoption / 20	12.5	9.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Declared
External providers	—	3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	—	—

Open in the live compare tool → Agency Agents profile Open Multi-Agent profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →