RegistryCompare › Agency Agents vs Open Multi-Agent

Agency Agents vs Open Multi-Agent

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agency Agents and Open Multi-Agent, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Agency Agents leads on trust — 64.0/100 (Grade C) vs 61.4/100 (Grade C), a 2.6-point gap. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agency Agentsmsitarzewski/agency-agents Open Multi-Agentopen-multi-agent/open-multi-agent
HVTrust score 64.0 61.4
Evidence grade C C
Coverage grade C C
Overall rank #200 #229
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems #8 #9
GitHub stars 153.9k 6.9k
Last updated today 3d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.7 / 10 5.5 / 10
License MIT MIT
Downloads
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 10.7 11.6
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.5 13.2
Maintenance / 20 17.6 18.6
Adoption / 20 12.4 9.2
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Declared
External providers 3 — Anthropic, Google Gemini, OpenAI
Requires API keys No Yes
Plugin surface
Provenance drift
Open in the live compare tool → Agency Agents profile Open Multi-Agent profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →