RegistryCompare › Agency Agents vs Concordia

Agency Agents vs Concordia

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agency Agents and Concordia, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Agency Agents leads on trust — 62.5/100 (Grade C) vs 62.3/100 (Grade C), a 0.2-point gap. Note: Agency Agents's evidence coverage is thinner (coverage C vs B) — its score rests on fewer independent signal types. Full breakdown below.
Signal Agency Agentsmsitarzewski/agency-agents Concordiagoogle-deepmind/concordia
HVTrust score 62.5 62.3
Evidence grade C C
Coverage grade C B
Overall rank #284 #290
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems #8 #9
GitHub stars 143.6k 1.6k
Last updated 6d ago 6d ago
Build provenance No No
OSSF Scorecard 4.9 / 10 7.8 / 10
License MIT Apache-2.0
Downloads 570/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25 11.0 9.8
Identity & provenance / 18 10.8 10.8
Transparency / 17 12.7 15.1
Maintenance / 20 15.6 14.0
Adoption / 20 12.4 11.4
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server Declared Declared
External providers 6 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Google Gemini, …
Requires API keys No No
Plugin surface
Provenance drift Match
Open in the live compare tool → Agency Agents profile Concordia profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →