Registry › Compare › Agency Agents vs CAMEL

Agency Agents vs CAMEL

Both are Grade C and 0.7 points apart, so choose on what you weigh most. Agency Agents leads on maintenance; CAMEL leads on supply-chain integrity and adoption, and rests on broader evidence.

C Agency Agents 63.3

A complete AI agency at your fingertips - From frontend wizards to Reddit community ninjas, from whimsy injectors to reality checkers. Each agent is a specialized expert with personality, processes, and proven deliverables.

msitarzewski/agency-agents · #560 overall · #13 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage C (2/5)

Choose Agency Agents if maintenance matters most.

+7.0Maintenance: last push 2d ago, against 4d ago

C CAMEL 64.0

🐫 CAMEL: The first and the best multi-agent framework. Finding the Scaling Law of Agents. https://www.camel-ai.org

camel-ai/camel · #526 overall · #12 Multi-Agent Systems · coverage A (4/5)

Choose CAMEL if supply-chain integrity and adoption matter most.

+3.9Safety / Integrity: 56% of recent commits signed, against 26%
+3.1Adoption
+1.6Transparency: OSSF Scorecard 6.8 against 4.9
A vs CEvidence coverage: 4 of 5 independent signal types, against 2

Where they differ

7.4

Safety / IntegrityCAMEL +3.9

11.3

12.7

TransparencyCAMEL +1.6

14.3

19.9

MaintenanceAgency Agents +7.0

12.9

12.5

AdoptionCAMEL +3.1

15.6

+0.0

Runtime calibrationAgency Agents +0.9

-0.9

1 dimension identical: Identity 10.8 · Full evidence table

An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of Agency Agents and CAMEL, two Multi-Agent Systems projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.

Full evidence

Signal	Agency Agentsmsitarzewski/agency-agents	CAMELcamel-ai/camel
HVTrust score	63.3	64.0
Evidence grade	C	C
Coverage grade	C	A
Overall rank	#560	#526
Rank in Multi-Agent Systems	#13	#12
GitHub stars	158.4k	17.8k
Last updated	2d ago	4d ago
Build provenance	No	No
OSSF Scorecard	4.9 / 10	6.8 / 10
License	MIT	Apache-2.0
Downloads	—	11k/wk
Trust dimensions (points earned)
Safety / integrity / 25	7.4	11.3
Identity & provenance / 18	10.8	10.8
Transparency / 17	12.7	14.3
Maintenance / 20	19.9	12.9
Adoption / 20	12.5	15.6
Runtime capability surface (full matrix)
MCP server	Declared	Declared
External providers	—	14 — Amazon Bedrock, Anthropic, Cohere, …
Requires API keys	No	Yes
Plugin surface	—	—
Provenance drift	—	Match

Open in the live compare tool → Agency Agents profile CAMEL profile More Multi-Agent Systems →

How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.4 →