A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol vs MCP Python SDK
An independent, evidence-based trust comparison of A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol and MCP Python SDK, two Protocols & Tool Integration projects in the HVTracker registry. Scores come from public, checkable signals — supply-chain provenance, OSSF Scorecard, maintenance, and adoption — not popularity.
A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol leads on trust — 89.7/100 (Grade A) vs 68.8/100 (Grade B), a 20.9-point gap. Full breakdown below.
| Signal | A2A / Agent2Agent Protocolgoogle/A2A | MCP Python SDKmodelcontextprotocol/python-sdk |
|---|---|---|
| HVTrust score | 89.7 | 68.8 |
| Evidence grade | A | B |
| Coverage grade | A | C |
| Overall rank | #13 | #219 |
| Rank in Protocols & Tool Integration | #1 | #8 |
| GitHub stars | 25.6k | 24.2k |
| Last updated | 2d ago | 1d ago |
| Build provenance | Yes | No |
| OSSF Scorecard | 7.0 / 10 | 7.1 / 10 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Downloads | 2.6M/wk | — |
| Trust dimensions (points earned) | ||
| Safety / integrity / 25 | 21.2 | 13.9 |
| Identity & provenance / 18 | 18.0 | 10.8 |
| Transparency / 17 | 14.4 | 14.5 |
| Maintenance / 20 | 17.6 | 17.7 |
| Adoption / 20 | 19.1 | 10.5 |
| Runtime capability surface (full matrix) | ||
| MCP server | — | Implemented |
| External providers | — | — |
| Requires API keys | No | No |
| Plugin surface | extensions | extensions |
| Provenance drift | Unknown | — |
Open in the live compare tool →
A2A / Agent2Agent Protocol profile
MCP Python SDK profile
More Protocols & Tool Integration →
How to read this: HVTrust (0–100) weighs supply-chain signals (provenance, OSSF Scorecard, signed commits, open license) alongside real-world adoption, scaled by an evidence-confidence factor. Grade bands: A ≥ 80, B ≥ 65, C ≥ 50, D < 50. Signals refresh daily. Full methodology v4.3 →